[BillingsLUG] Outlook? Anyone?

[Mike Berry]

Wow, never would have thought of these. Thanks to all. And I'll let you know
what happens.!!

 

  _____  

From: billingslug-bounces at billingslug.org
[mailto:billingslug-bounces at billingslug.org] On Behalf Of dan
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 20:06
To: Mailing list for the Billings Linux User Group
Subject: Re: [BillingsLUG] Outlook? Anyone?

 

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Andrew Niemantsverdriet
<andrewniemants at gmail.com> wrote:

Mike,


On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Mike Berry CT~SE <mike at ct-se.com> wrote:

> Has anyone seen Outlook start refusing to complete a send when more than @
4
> address are put into recipient fields?
>
>  It just sits in the outbox, never finishes sending, all address are known
> good, and eventually get an email saying one was rejected by the recipient
> mail server as unknown address. Yet this is a good address and can be
> emailed alone. The outgoing email still sitting in the outbox until
deleted.
>

Also if the outlook PST file is large I have seen issues like that. Or
some times one email seems to be "corrupted" if you delete that email
and recreate it, the email seems to send.

Not sure if this helps at all,
 _
/-\ ndrew

 

FYI, Outlook 2000 has a 1.9GB'ish limit, while newer versions have much
large limits 'IF' they created the PST file.  An example would be if you
upgraded from Outlook2000 to Outlook2003 then you would keep the old style
PST file.  This bit me in the butt as I could only find info on Outlook2003
support 20GB PST files.  Something to check.

 

 

_______________________________________________
BillingsLUG mailing list
BillingsLUG at billingslug.org
http://lists.billingslug.org/mailman/listinfo/billingslug
http://www.billingslug.org group information

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.billingslug.org/pipermail/billingslug/attachments/20101022/051246b5/attachment.html